I would love one, but suspect the weight (2kg) would be an issue. I'm considering a RF100-500 but the awfy expensive...
 
Sounds interesting and a pretty compelling FL range for wildlife shooters. Are there any image samples and/or reviews yet?
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


 
I pre-ordered. I'm hoping this will be a suitable replacement for my EF 100-400ii that I've been using with the 2x TC over the years for airshows. I like that it can still take the 1.4x/2x converters going forward as well.
 
@jwcdds
Cool. I have the RF 100-500mm and it is truly excellent. I does also very well with the RF 1.4xTC for perched birds, but my BIF pics tend to be a bit soft-ish with the extender. Could be me of course. Nevertheless I'm really curious how this lens will do with flying objects.
 
@jwcdds
Cool. I have the RF 100-500mm and it is truly excellent. I does also very well with the RF 1.4xTC for perched birds, but my BIF pics tend to be a bit soft-ish with the extender. Could be me of course. Nevertheless I'm really curious how this lens will do with flying objects.
In my most recent airshow outing, I was shooting the ef100-400ii w/ two 2x TC. I mean if you want to talk about diffraction and degradation of image quality, I can't think of many worse ways to do it. :D

That said, I got away with some pretty decent shots given the frankenstein combo. So I figured starting at 200-800 should give me a great advantage over my existing setup.
 
In my most recent airshow outing, I was shooting the ef100-400ii w/ two 2x TC. I mean if you want to talk about diffraction and degradation of image quality, I can't think of many worse ways to do it. :D

That said, I got away with some pretty decent shots given the frankenstein combo. So I figured starting at 200-800 should give me a great advantage over my existing setup.
Makes a lot of sense, Julian.
When will this lens start shipping?
 
@digital paradise
Well spotted, DP.
Canon apparently doesn't know its own lenses.
Makes you wonder what else they missed. I think the key ones like dual vs single nano AF motors and optics is accurate as far as I know. Not dealing with a TC has a lot of appeal. Even with 5 stops hand holding an 800mm lens will be tougher. BIF very challenging. That puts me in this area. Can't I just crop that last 100mm?
 
Back
Top Bottom